"Im so sorry and congratulations to member 67483 you are of course correct in that if you discard the paraflex hyperbolic signal tangent within the meat pie and divide the two resultant cognitive bilateral divergent waves, huh silly me. You of course then have to reject your Granny as being none frangilatory and thus 10 to the power of prunes becomes a bag of peanuts. Well done sir I take my hat off to you."
I read this on a quantum physics web site this morning and its been bugging me all day. "No" I thought if the paraflexible convibulator is divided by the flex to flux convertive bisentinial curve and thus reaches transendictive vortex coagulant minus 3 or 5 throngalhertz, which would be in tolerance as laid down in the Asdictivational gigatrump hypothasized by Prof Hinderblast-Fleshwound's 1936 paper on time travel vortex generation using only hand held fruit, you would end up with a bunch of carnations..... er... surely.
All of which goes to prove that life really could be just a bowl of cherries. or could it???
All these question and more like, why do I squint when trying not to look a a womens arse? and what makes walkers crisps so addictive? could be answered by quantum physics. Have you ever seen a Professor of quantum physics? me neither but I bet they like dogs and can speak fluent Dutch and even worse Danish. You may scoff, but these things worry me! Could Danish be Dutch backwards or a backward Dutchman Speaking Danish? or just a throat infection.. Really I want to know?
I often muse on such matters while microwaving my chinese battered sweet and sour chicken with peas (£2 from Iceland) or over a custard cream with that great thinker Bob the dog, whose paper on "are sausages really an aid to time travel" won the Nooobel prize for lateral lunch last year.
No comments:
Post a Comment