Imagine your 14 or 15 and have been set the Middle East as some kind of home work. Here is my attempt:
President Assad of Syria (who was good) is now a nasty guy who got nasty after his people rebelled for reasons no one can remember now. All anyone can recall is that Syria was a nice place and now is not and the Rebels (who are good) started winning after Assad tried to gas them and in doing so walked over President Obaman who was a red line in the sand.
But then some of the rebels fighting Assad turned a bit nasty after a previous punch up with a bunch of Sunni Nut jobs in Iraq who had been fighting UK and the USA (remember that war) which was bad, but we have forgotten about that, because we lost... Ok? So, the bad guys formed IS/Daersh or similar which is an oil company (who are definitely bad) and some other folks in Iraq continued to support democracy (who are still good) and now are fighting IS in Syria over the oil in Iraq.. Yeah crazy eh!
So, anyway yeah the Americans (who are good) started bombing Islamic State (who are bad) and giving arms to the Syrian Rebels (who are good) so they could fight Assad (who is still bad) which is good and on even days fight IS Oil Plc who are crazy.
By the way, there is a breakaway state in the north of somewhere or other run by the Curds (who are good and who want to fight IS) - (which is a good thing),, But they also want to fight Turkey and the Turkish think they are bad, so we have to say they are bad whilst secretly thinking they're good and giving them guns to fight IS and the Turks as long as they keep it shut about that.. right, (which is good) but what freaks me out is that there is two Curdistans sort of. and I dont know which is which. Erm Ish.....I think... Yeah? Sorry, I mean Kurds is it?
Getting back to Syria. President Putin (bad, as he invaded Crimea and the Ukraine and killed lots of folks including that nice Russian man in London with a poisoned polonium sausage) has decided to back Assad (who is still bad) but they say they are attacking IS (who are also bad) which is sort of a good thing?
But, Putin (still bad) thinks the Syrian Rebels (who are good) are also bad, and so he bombs them too. Much to the annoyance of the Americans (who are good) and who are busy backing and arming the rebels (who are also good) so they can attack the Syrians and any Russians when they aint bombing IS and being good.
Now Iran (who used to be bad, but not now they have agreed not to build any nuclear weapons and bomb Israel are now good) are supporting Assad (still mostly bad) as are the Russians (bad but good when they attack IS) for reasons that completely bloody escape me and I suspect that makes them........erm good ish.Sorry Im getting a head ache.
But then some of the rebels fighting Assad turned a bit nasty after a previous punch up with a bunch of Sunni Nut jobs in Iraq who had been fighting UK and the USA (remember that war) which was bad, but we have forgotten about that, because we lost... Ok? So, the bad guys formed IS/Daersh or similar which is an oil company (who are definitely bad) and some other folks in Iraq continued to support democracy (who are still good) and now are fighting IS in Syria over the oil in Iraq.. Yeah crazy eh!
So, anyway yeah the Americans (who are good) started bombing Islamic State (who are bad) and giving arms to the Syrian Rebels (who are good) so they could fight Assad (who is still bad) which is good and on even days fight IS Oil Plc who are crazy.
By the way, there is a breakaway state in the north of somewhere or other run by the Curds (who are good and who want to fight IS) - (which is a good thing),, But they also want to fight Turkey and the Turkish think they are bad, so we have to say they are bad whilst secretly thinking they're good and giving them guns to fight IS and the Turks as long as they keep it shut about that.. right, (which is good) but what freaks me out is that there is two Curdistans sort of. and I dont know which is which. Erm Ish.....I think... Yeah? Sorry, I mean Kurds is it?
Getting back to Syria. President Putin (bad, as he invaded Crimea and the Ukraine and killed lots of folks including that nice Russian man in London with a poisoned polonium sausage) has decided to back Assad (who is still bad) but they say they are attacking IS (who are also bad) which is sort of a good thing?
But, Putin (still bad) thinks the Syrian Rebels (who are good) are also bad, and so he bombs them too. Much to the annoyance of the Americans (who are good) and who are busy backing and arming the rebels (who are also good) so they can attack the Syrians and any Russians when they aint bombing IS and being good.
Now Iran (who used to be bad, but not now they have agreed not to build any nuclear weapons and bomb Israel are now good) are supporting Assad (still mostly bad) as are the Russians (bad but good when they attack IS) for reasons that completely bloody escape me and I suspect that makes them........erm good ish.Sorry Im getting a head ache.
So
a Coalition of Assad (still bad) Putin (extra bad) and the Iranians
(good, but in a bad sort of way) are going to attack IS (who are bad)
which is a good, but also the Syrian Rebels (who are good) which
is bad and who are being armed and have US troops with them which is erm......................good.
Now the British (obviously good) and the Americans (also good) cannot attack Assad (still bad) for fear of upsetting Putin (bad) and Iran (good / bad) and now they have to accept that Assad might not be that bad after all compared to IS (who are super bad).
So Assad (bad) is now probably good, being better than IS (no real choice there) and since Putin and Iran are also fighting IS that may now make them good. America (still good) will find it hard to arm a group of rebels being attacked by the Russians for fear of upsetting Mr Putin (now good) and that mad Ayatollah in Iran (also now good) and so they may be forced to say that the Rebels are now bad, or at the very least abandon them to their fate. This will lead most of them to flee to Turkey and on to Europe or join ISEco petroleum Co Europe (still the only constantly bad group) and attack us for being confused, which is Bad..
Now things get a bit fuzzy... Sunni Muslims from somwhere near Iraq, are still attacking Shia Muslims in Iraq and everyone is attacking each other for reasons I dont get around some place called Mosul, but it spills out all over the place and most of Iraq is worse than down town Luton on an average night and is probably good or bad depending on who is arming them..ish.
Back in Syria (remember that?) we have America (now good and bad) and Britain (also good and bad) providing limited support to Sunni Rebels (bad) many of whom are looking to IS (bad) for support against Assad (now good) who, along with Iran (also good) and Putin (also, now, unbelievably, good ) are attempting to retake the country Assad used to run before all this started by bombing civilians and anyone else who may be good or bad?
Meanwhile er.... Israel is doing what it always does and will nuke the first one who upsets it... Good or Bad!
Now the British (obviously good) and the Americans (also good) cannot attack Assad (still bad) for fear of upsetting Putin (bad) and Iran (good / bad) and now they have to accept that Assad might not be that bad after all compared to IS (who are super bad).
So Assad (bad) is now probably good, being better than IS (no real choice there) and since Putin and Iran are also fighting IS that may now make them good. America (still good) will find it hard to arm a group of rebels being attacked by the Russians for fear of upsetting Mr Putin (now good) and that mad Ayatollah in Iran (also now good) and so they may be forced to say that the Rebels are now bad, or at the very least abandon them to their fate. This will lead most of them to flee to Turkey and on to Europe or join ISEco petroleum Co Europe (still the only constantly bad group) and attack us for being confused, which is Bad..
Now things get a bit fuzzy... Sunni Muslims from somwhere near Iraq, are still attacking Shia Muslims in Iraq and everyone is attacking each other for reasons I dont get around some place called Mosul, but it spills out all over the place and most of Iraq is worse than down town Luton on an average night and is probably good or bad depending on who is arming them..ish.
Back in Syria (remember that?) we have America (now good and bad) and Britain (also good and bad) providing limited support to Sunni Rebels (bad) many of whom are looking to IS (bad) for support against Assad (now good) who, along with Iran (also good) and Putin (also, now, unbelievably, good ) are attempting to retake the country Assad used to run before all this started by bombing civilians and anyone else who may be good or bad?
Meanwhile er.... Israel is doing what it always does and will nuke the first one who upsets it... Good or Bad!
I
hope that this clears it all up for you? Naturally the problems in
Libya have been excluded from this for clarity. Basically
GhadaffiDuck and Blair decided it would be a good idea if they had a
spring clean and it all went a bit Pete Tongue. Now everything in Libya
is deemed for planning purposes as BAD.
Ohh and Saudi Arabia is bombing Yemen because it can and has lots of bombs and aircraft provided by UK with is good for jobs right?
Ohh and Saudi Arabia is bombing Yemen because it can and has lots of bombs and aircraft provided by UK with is good for jobs right?